Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Eric Goldman's avatar

Thanks again, George, for bringing us the news that counts. Politics has become a game of poker, and in this vein, Carney vs. Trump would normally be a foregone conclusion. Not only does Carney hold a few aces up his sleeve, as this article and your previous ones have outlined, but the evil King has no concept of a straight face or any real comprehension of how to use fact versus fiction in a negotiation.

But…we're talking about making a deal with a man who makes and unmakes deals with little regard for formal signatures. That's the part poker can't model. In poker, once the hand's played, the chips move and stay moved. With this administration, the chips move, get photographed moving, and then quietly move back the moment it's convenient, with a straight face and no acknowledgement anything happened at all.

Which is exactly why leading with Churchill Falls instead of trade is the smarter play than it first looks. A tariff concession is a promise about tomorrow, and tomorrow is precisely where this man's word has never once held. A 985-megawatt export line into a US grid already straining under AI demand is a fact today, humming, delivering power whether or not Trump feels like honouring anything he said last Tuesday. Carney isn't just showing Trump a card. He's showing him something the King can't later pretend was never dealt, because Massachusetts will be able to feel the difference in its own electricity bill. That's not a hand played against Trump's bluffing. It's a hand played against his memory, and this King is well known for having none that inconveniences him.

Mostly Harmless Cat Lady's avatar

Second point: Electricity to trade will be attractive to the Americans and at least is a positive lever.

It also will remind Trump of Ford’s threat to surcharge energy to northern tier states. I bet Trump doesn’t think we would do anything really “nasty” for fear of his revenge. Because of his sense that he’s fearsome, we can use that to our advantage. I’m sure PM Carney has already thought about what retaliation would be most effective and how it can be surgically applied.

We won’t/can’t hold back on Red River and Columbia River flows in a year of drought, or stop helping with wildfires, but everything Canadian needs to be surcharged, export taxed or otherwise made painful enough so that the US feels at least the same pain as Canada. And Canadians of all partisan stripes need to support the Carney government as we navigate these rapids rather than complain.

13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?